33755

I was reading on Wikileaks and came across the below section from the Wikileaks: About webpage.

It struck me how what Wikileaks editorial staff was describing as corruption in corporations as being akin to a small nation.

Corporate Scientology has long been secretive and abusive in the way described below. Most of us wouldn’t be critics of Scientology if Scientology wasn’t committing crimes, widespread fraud, and abusing human rights. If Scientology was merely “a kooky religion” we wouldn’t care at all. In our fight to expose Scientology, pointing out the kookiness (Xenu et al) is merely fun, but isn’t the backbone of the criticism.

I dedicate this post to my renewed vow to expose Scientology in every way I can. A lot of you Anons, critics, OG & exes are doing a good job at exposing Scientology’s crimes. Keep up the good work. 2009 will see more scio-crimes exposed than Corporate Scientology remembers they’ve committed.

Does Wikileaks support corporate whistleblowers?

It is increasingly obvious that corporate fraud must be effectively addressed. In the US, employees account for most revelations of fraud, followed by industry regulators, media, auditors and, finally, the SEC. Whistleblowers account for around half of all exposures of fraud.

Corporate corruption comes in many forms. The number of employees and turnover of some corporations exceeds the population and GDP of some nation states. When comparing countries, after observations of population size and GDP, it is usual to compare the system of government, the major power groupings and the civic freedoms available to their populations. Such comparisons can also be illuminating in the case of corporations.

Considering the largest corporations as analogous to a nation state reveals the following properties:

1. The right to vote does not exist except for share holders (analogous to land owners) and even there voting power is in proportion to ownership.
2. All power issues from a central committee.
3. There is no balancing division of power. There is no fourth estate. There are no juries and innocence is not presumed.
4. Failure to submit to any order may result in instant exile.
5. There is no freedom of speech.
6. There is no right of association. Even romance between men and women is often forbidden without approval.
7. The economy is centrally planned.
8. There is pervasive surveillance of movement and electronic communication.
9. The society is heavily regulated, to the degree many employees are told when, where and how many times a day they can go to the toilet.
10. There is little transparency and something like the Freedom of Information Act is unimaginable.
11. Internal opposition groups, such as unions, are blackbanned, surveilled and/or marginalized whenever and wherever possible.

While having a GDP and population comparable to Belgium, Denmark or New Zealand, many of these multi-national corporations have nothing like their quality of civic freedoms and protections. This is even more striking when the regional civic laws the company operates under are weak (such as in West Papua, many African states or even South Korea); there, the character of these corporate tyrannies is unobscured by their civilizing surroundings.

Through governmental corruption, political influence, or manipulation of the judicial system, abusive corporations are able to gain control over the defining element of government — the sole right to deploy coercive force.

Wikileaks endeavors to civilize corporations by exposing uncivil plans and behavior. Just like a country, a corrupt or unethical corporation is a menace to all inside and outside it.

OTBT

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Sc..._leaks_by_date

www.exposescientology.com

"... I’d actually like to take a break and take some time off and go and do the Rehabilitation Project Force. It’s something that is held in high regard by members of the Sea Organisation." - Tommy Davis in Four Corners Interview

Anonymous

I predict more leaks/exposures coming this year. In particular, two categories.

1. Scientology books and lectures that had been available to the general public for purchase. I predict these will be proliferating around the Internet in a volume and speed never before seen, and unable to quash.

2. Private files from exscientologists; material that has not been seen before and was never available for "purchase" but which was given freely to scientologists and implicates the Church of Scientology in some wrongdoing for a 501(c)(3). For example, this material will connect Scientology's "allegedly secular front groups" to the Church of Scientology with such a strong connection that Church of Scientology management will not be able to effectively counter the evidence that CofS actually runs/controls these groups.

The reason I choose #2 is that exscientologists seem to be getting a little bolder. Scientologists do not draw lines between the "secular front groups" and Scientology. To them, all is Hubbard, all is perfect, all needs to be spread. They don't draw lines between these groups. CofS management is likewise sloppy about this. It is only the "front groups" themselves who choose to deny associations with CofS.

Their connections will be exposed this year.

That is my prediction.