Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members - Why We Protest

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.

»» Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members
»		Why We Protest \| Activism Forum » News and Current Events » Leaks & Legal

Leaks & Legal Leaks & Legal material concerning The Organization of Scientology

Page 1 of 2

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display Modes

11-23-2009

post #1 (link to here)

mongrel

flamer

Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Co$ has unwittingly confirmed that a disconnection policy exists for staff members. The legal response to a small claims filing (see thread here) contains a portion of the staff members' contract. This contract has the following clause:

Quote:

TOMMY DAVIS: Anything that's characterized as disconnection... it's just not true. There isn't any such policy in the church that's dictating who people should or should not be in communication with. It just doesn't happen.

YouTube- Tommy Davis on disconnection policy (excerpt)

Section 10 certainly sounds like it dictates who staff members should not communicate with. Look for more mistakes like this as the big lawyers are kept busy with the flood of lolsuits and the org peons have to handle the little claims.

EDIT: download ling for legal response
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=F0QUGT3U

Last edited by mongrel; 11-23-2009 at 08:30 PM.. Reason: added download ling

11-23-2009

post #2 (link to here)

_You_

Awesome

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Quote:

Originally Posted by mongrel

So we now have a legal record that a staff disconnection policy was in force as of Oct 25, 2009. Any suggestions for good pooning targets with this info?

Here's a little something to refresh your memory.

YouTube- Tommy Davis on disconnection policy (excerpt)

Section 10 certainly sounds like it dictates who staff members should not communicate with. Look for more mistakes like this as the big lawyers are kept busy with the flood of lolsuits and the org peons have to handle the little claims.

Transcript of s10 for those of us behind firewalls and filters?

11-23-2009

post #3 (link to here)

_You_ Awesome	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members well ! ther ya go.

11-23-2009

post #4 (link to here)

ultrapoet

fuckin peacefag

Location: The ATL

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

10. ASSOCIATION WITH INDIVIDUALS NOT IN GOOD STANDING. During my service as a staff member, I agree not to knowingly associate, in any way, with former parishioners of the Church or any other Scientology organization who are either no longer in good standing, or have been expelled or have been declared.

Matthew 5:44
The Metta Sutta
HCO Policy Letter 18 October 1967

Which one of these is not like the others?

11-23-2009

post #5 (link to here)

Buttons Member	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Love it! How will they try to counter this?

11-23-2009

post #6 (link to here)

TexasAnon

Nov. 5

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buttons

Love it!

How will they try to counter this?

maybee they will die

Remember, remember the 5th of November, the gun powder treason and plot. I know of no reason why the gun powder treason should ever be forgot.

-V for Vendetta

11-23-2009

post #7 (link to here)

Etain Member	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Can't wait for their response to a legal document *confirming* Disconnection! Should be good... and lulzy.

11-23-2009

post #8 (link to here)

_You_ Awesome	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members YOU BIGOTS YOOK THIS OUT OF CONTEXT!!!!!!!!

11-23-2009

post #9 (link to here)

Ann O'Nymous Member	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Source: MEGAUPLOAD - The leading online storage and file delivery service Une histoire d'anonyme - An anonymous story - SwissAnons - Best troll 2008 - SMB rules

11-23-2009

post #10 (link to here)

Lightattheendofthetunnel Member	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members No, No, It's all taken out of content. (Lying, scamming, abusive fucks of Scientology who insist on their right to abuse and defraud people) Nice post..... Last edited by Lightattheendofthetunnel; 11-23-2009 at 08:29 PM..

11-23-2009

post #11 (link to here)

stuwyatt Beep! Beep! Location: where my cat tells me to be	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Nice :) It will be interesting to see how the cult try and wriggle lie their way out of this one.... CULT WATCH: Plymouth Scientology videos - Protest Pics [Old] [Latest] [Sadly retired from street protesting]

11-23-2009

post #12 (link to here)

Im not a scientologist but fifty seven	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Good catch

11-23-2009

post #13 (link to here)

_You_ Awesome	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Gee, somebody should add that to their letter to the Au senators? ;) Moar de merrier!

11-23-2009

post #14 (link to here)

CantPickaName Merchant	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members too bad it says nothing about non-scientologists Educate the public more!! Leave cards/leaflets anywhere you go.The public is the future Jurors All Anons please go say hi to VaLLarr the OSA on youtube.But be fore-warned..She says she will CRUSH any Anon that dares debate her!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCGP-...eature=related

11-23-2009

post #15 (link to here)

_You_

Awesome

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Related policy. Scientology claims disconnection is not allowed, but if a Scientologist has dealings with a Suppressive Person, he is committing a Suppressive Act and will be punished. The only way a Scientologist can freely communicate with an SP is by leaving Scientology.

A puddle of leaks

Quote:

SCIENTOLOGY POLICY DIRECTIVE

SCN POLICY DIRECTIVE 28
13 August 1982

BPI
ALL STAFF
ALL PUBLIC

SUPPRESSIVE ACT
DEALING WITH A DECLARED SUPPRESSIVE PERSON

REF: HCO PL 16 May 80 II ETHICS SUPPRESSIVE ACTS
SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY
AND SCIENTOLOGISTS

"A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON or GROUP is one that actively seeks,
by action or statement, to suppress or damage Scientology or a
Scientologist by Suppressive Acts.

"SUPPRESSIVE ACTS are acts calculated to impede or destroy
Scientology or a Scientologist in his studies or counselling, or
to affect adversely his well-being." (HCO PL 16 May 80 II)

It is a SUPPRESSIVE ACT to deal with a Declared SUPPRESSIVE
PERSON unless you are the named terminal to deal with the SP
(i.e. Sea Org MAA). Per the above referenced PL, "continued
adherence to a person or group accurately pronounced a Suppressive
Person or Group by HCO" is a Suppressive Act.

To maintain a line with, offer support to, or in any way
grant credence to such a person indicates nothing more than
agreement with that person's destructive intentions and acts.
Such dealings in fact act as a covert or overt attempt to under-
mine and negate the ethics and justice strengths of our ecclesias-
tical structure.

Standard on-policy lines exist should a Declared SP seek
to set things right and make up for damage caused.

So labeled and declared, a person claiming injustice has
the right to request a Committee of Evidence via their nearest
HCO.

However, unless you are the named authorized terminal to
deal with the Suppressive Person, to deal with one constitutes
no less than a Suppressive Act. Such an act is cause to have
levied against you the same per policy Church justice procedures
afforded any Suppressive Person. Full ethics penalties will
be applied.

Where the matter concerns family relations or where a Scien-
tologist is in the position of being closely associated to a
person found to be Suppressive the materials covering Potential
Trouble Sources apply. There is no practice of "disconnection"
allowed in the Church of Scientology and these materials cover
completely how one may use proper lines and procedures to handle
a PTS condition.

One does not however use a false excuse of "handling my PTS
condition" to covertly maintain a line of supportful dealings
and agreements with an SP. If you wish to maintain such a line,
do so outside of current and future membership in the Church.

To deal with a Suppressive is a Suppressive Act.

The above is unequivocal Church Policy.

WATCHDOG COMMITTEE

for the

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

CSI:WTC:dr

11-23-2009

post #16 (link to here)

_You_

Awesome

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Quote:

Originally Posted by CantPickaName

too bad it says nothing about non-scientologists

That would've been gold but it does prove that Tommy was clearly lying when he said there aren't any disconnection policies. This only mentions staff members but isn't Tommy one of the SeaOgres? Aren't they staff members? So shouldn't he know about this policy?

It's value is in getting people to ask the following question:
If the official spokesman is blatantly lying about this... what else is he lying about?

11-23-2009

post #17 (link to here)

Kha Khan

EX COS, ARS OG

Location: Marcab Confederacy

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultrapoet

Matthew 5:44
The Metta Sutta
HCO Policy Letter 18 October 1967

Which one of these is not like the others?

Best Ex, critical or Anon sig ever. Very well done.

Ex Scientologist Message Board

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -- Hunter S. Thompson.

11-23-2009

post #18 (link to here)

Kha Khan EX COS, ARS OG Location: Marcab Confederacy	Posted to ESMB for great justice. / Great catch. Cross-posted to ESMB for great justice: COS confirms disconnection for staff members / Ex Scientologist Message Board "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -- Hunter S. Thompson.

11-23-2009

post #19 (link to here)

Bob Loblaw FREE HUGS Location: Portland, Oregon	Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members Fantastic catch!

11-23-2009

post #20 (link to here)

_You_

Awesome

Re: Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Quote:

Originally Posted by mongrel

So we now have a legal record that a staff disconnection policy was in force as of Oct 25, 2009. Any suggestions for good pooning targets with this info?

The full contract is on this page

http://www.exposescientology.com/sci...contracts.html

under the category "Church of Scientology, Staff".

Page 1 of 2

		Why We Protest \| Activism Forum » News and Current Events » Leaks & Legal
Co$ confirms disconnection for staff members

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode