Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Kirstie Alley should not be targeted because of her fatness- Shit a lot of anons are much bigger than her- butt(yeah everyone's got one and some are bigger) because she supports a criminal organization that blatantly and without remorse, abuses human rights. And free speech. She has kept her mouth shut lately. She is not the target. amirite?
|
I have said similar things before...the answer is always that it's important to point out how, despite being however high on the bridge she is, she is not "at cause" over her eating/weight gain. And I do understand that. But I still feel sorry for her. It's bad enough to be an ordinary wog, dealing with a weight problem; she's got the eyes of the world on her and must constantly feel pressure from that and from being a fat, aging actress in the entertainment business. And I'm sure she feels like a loser in terms of the whole "being at cause" deal, because in Scientology, it's always your own fault, not the fault of the tech or the auditors or other people handling you. So I'd rather make fun of Scientology for failing her than make fun of her for failing. But then I am a fat
douchebag myself.
Also, inb4 "She obviously HASN'T kept her mouth shut ENOUGH lately."