View Single Post
Old 05-17-2009
Anonymous
We Are Legion
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Default Re: Diskeeper Company Handbook & Case Update

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfyde View Post
Didn't a federal judge require that all e-meters be labeled as "for entertainment purposes only" not that quote but something similar.

But Scientology does claim the E-meter as a "religious releck". - sorry can't spell releck tonight.
Secrets of Scientology: The E-Meter

Quote:
Here is part of the order issued by Judge Gesell in United States v. An Article or Device "Hubbard Electrometer." et al., 333 F. Supp. 357 (D.D.C. 1971), which forbids the Church of Scientology and all related organizations from claiming to heal using an E-Meter:
The device should bear a prominent, clearly visible notice warning that any person using it for auditing or counseling of any kind is forbidden by law to represent that there is any medical or scientific basis for believing or asserting that the device is useful in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease. It should be noted in the warning that the device has been condemned by a United States District Court for misrepresentation and misbranding under the Food and Drug laws, that use is permitted only as part of religious activity, and that the E-meter is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily functions of anyone.
Here is the actual wording on the Super Mark VII's data plate. As you can see, it does not fully comply with the judge's order:
HUBBARD ELECTROMETER MANUFACTURING

By itself, this meter does nothing. It is solely for the guide of Ministers of the Church in Confessionals and pastoral counselling. The Electrometer is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily function of anyone and is for religious use by students and Ministers of the Church of Scientology only. HUBBARD, E-METER and SCIENTOLOGY are trademarks and service marks owned by RTC and used with its permission.
Anonymous is offline   Reply With Quote