DRAMA~~I Was Told To Come To You~~DRAMA (Part 3)

Right, because as the challenging questions go deeper, the responses get more incoherent. Roger that.

LOL,..., they are sooooo lucky I'm not 20 years younger - - I was a lot more
aggressive and tenacious back "then." - - but I am more patient now, even
with Irish blood,..., LOL

.

We are in some ways, a much scarier cult than Scientology;
but rather like the SubGenii, Anonymous doesn't afraid of that moniker.
What Slack we lack, is made up for with delicious cake. and the occasional turkey

I warned you.

No, because there is no need to challenge, question or crucify an ex that wandered in here not looking for a fight. I know everyone is missing their favorite sci trolls, but this guy isn't Tildacity. Why do we have to jump on a low level ex for Lisa McPherson and Jenny Gormann? That is like jumping on all republicans because of Watergate or all Democrats because of Monica Lewinsky. It makes anons seem weak minded and petty.

Yup, and if every time someone new shows up s/he is instantly devoured out of boredom we will be a much smaller one too.

You must be new here.

I've been waiting for you...

Member Since:
Nov 4, 2011
Messages:
487
Likes Received:
315
Trophy Points:
0

Damn, you beat me to it anonymous.

Fuck you. Telling you to educate yourself about the abuse of your former cult when you come here apologizing and even talking it up, is not mind control. But you thinking it is just reinforces how fucked up and untethered from reality you are.

What exactly did you expect slobeck?

No one is "devouring" him out of boredom. If you come here and have the fucking balls to say ho great the purif is and defending the behavior of the cult by calling its victims "whiners" he's gonna fucking get eaten. Got a problem with it? Go play Hello Kitty Island Adventure. This here's the deep end of the pool. If you can't handle adult swim GTFO.

Or you could, I dunno, ask him some questions or something. God forbid anyone have any infos that the great Anon doesn't already know about.

Someone forgot to take their Ritalin, again.

I have been. And I don't buy his answers. Man, you bitches have gone soft.

Welcome CaseSuperStar. I don't agree with all of what you say but certainly appreciate the opportunity to hear read it. Ignore the trolls and please don't let them drive you away.

OK bb

Well, it looks like you got rid of him. You really should learn to chew your food before you swallow it.

I generally like him, but he's still a retard. Give him some time.

It's okay. I'm mediating my medications very very carefully...

Regarding Jennifer Gorman's rape he answers "I'LL GET RIGHT ON THAT!!! Er... mebe NOT?"

He may be well meaning and willing to talk about his experience, but doing so on the WWP message board isn't where he should be right now. Being a dick can be lulzy; being an oblivious dick, not so much.

Fortunately, I have no doubt that the experienced ex-scis run this.

Can I have some?

And you shouldn't. Take them as prescribed.

What - you are expecting some sort of logic and linearity out of me? Please..

I would think that based on first impressions acting like a flip, oblivious dick would seem to be an effective way to try to fit in around here.

To NOT share would be an overt of MAGNITUDE. So if I've got some I'll share some (of whatevs)...

That is your argument? Pretty big leap from some exes are whiny to "Jenny is whiny because she reported a rape and to keep from being a winy ex she should never have reported it"

Dude, back away from the keyboard.

you can go on. go for it

...derailing this catfight...

CSS I'm interested in your take on children, or young people perhaps, becoming involved in scientology auditing. I've always been curious on the effect that has on relationships with their parents and whether it serves to support or diminish that relationship. Does it encourage young people to keep information from their parents as the literature definitely appears to indicate?

Translation: i could give a fuck about all those things you just wrote or any of the things my cult is responsible for.

(Boorish asshole is still an asshole.)

That wasn't his tone and you know it. He implied that people who complain publicly about the abuse they suffered are whiners. And so I fairly want to know where he draws the line. Which people are whiners and which have the right according to him to complain? People who lost their life savings? or people who were raped or forced to have abortions. It's a fair question.

What difference does it make where he draws the line? This seems like a totally rhetorical line of faux inquiry designed to challenge the guy to an online dick waving contest. Where does that get us?

well, it's not. But thanks for psychically determining my motives for asking a totally fair question.

You know. It's easier to stay out of "the fight" if you're convincing yourself that the cult's crimes against its members are not that big of a deal and that those who suffered are just being pussies. When you stop denying the severity of the cult's activities, activities that he participated in, you sort of gain the impetus to fight for what's right.

Thank you, this is at the very least the beginning of a coherent argument. Having said that, you cannot bludgeon someone into fighting for 'what's right'.

Well, for one thing it'd be great if your post made sense and used actual quotes, but the bar is low for you, so...

Read post 350 again

Allrighteethen.
Take the freakshow outside, really.

pfft!
alrighty then

Sadly Dave people can go on and on. Back some 50 years and endlessly. My question is what now for David DeMoss? You are here now and I am glad you are. It tells me that this issue is important to you. What would you like to accomplish? What rool do you see yourself playing in making change and the world a better place. How has life changed for you since you got out?

I received a strong worded letter from the COS Law Firm, Heenen and Blaike, to cease "Tarninshing" their clients
reputation, so I'll chose my words carefully. The Sauna Purification Rundown in ORGS and Narconon are a serious
threat to patient, clients, students, and the public. In a healthy person, Health Canada recommends no more
than 500mg. I witnessed some patients in the Sauna for up to 55 days, 5 hours per day and an end dose of 5,000mg.

I also have a Coroner's Autopsy Report, stating the deceased liver was 50% destroyed. (difficult to link ALL 50% to Sauna).

People who are not healthy (Narconon Patients) undergoing the Sauna, can be deadly, as I witnessed two patients admitted
to Trois-Rivier hospital emergency )one was in a coma for 3 days).

As a patient at NN TR, I endured 26 days and a painful last few days at 2,600mg. The only way I was able to finish the Sauna,
was to ask other patients (students), what the hell to write for me "End Phenomena" - - bull-shit rubbish treatment.

As an recruited employee as a Course Room Supervisor, Registrar, and Graduate Officer, I am truly sorry for any damage
I may have caused to ANY and ALL vulnerable patients. I've spent many a sleepless nights, with heart wrenching memories
and only with professional help, am I able to cope and function now.

Just my two cents worth

.