Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

Scientology spokeswoman Pat Harney denies the written policy of Disconnection.

About 200 Protest Scientology

Pat Harney is LYING.

Some FAIR USE references for Pat Harney and Scientology to explain. All references were written by L. Ron Hubbard. And none of this is confidential information.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 23 December 1965
ETHICS SUPPRESSIVE ACTS SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS THE FAIR GAME LAW

Disconnection from a family member or cessation of adherence to a Suppressive Person or Group is done by the Potential Trouble Source publicly publishing the fact, as in the legal notices of "The Auditor" and public announcements and taking any required civil action such as disavowal, separation or divorce and thereafter cutting all further communication and disassociating from the person or group.

Therefore this is a serious thing - to tolerate or remain connected to a source of active suppression of a Scientologist or Scientology without legally disconnecting the relationship or acting to expose the true motives behind the hostility and reform the person...

Any HCO Secretary may receive evidences of disconnection or disavowal or separation or divorce and, on finding them to be bona fide, may publicly announce them on a public board and legal notices in "The Auditor".

The disconnecting person then ceases to be a Potential Trouble Source.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 5 April 1965
D of T Hat THE BASIS OF INSANITY

For this person may only be audited further if he or she disconnects or handles the Suppressive Person or group to which he or she is connected and can't be sent to the HGC or back to the course either until the status is cleared up...

Until it's handled or disconnected we don't want it around as it's just more trouble and the person will cave in if audited under those conditions (connected to a Suppressive Person or group).

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 5 April 1965
THE NO-GAIN-CASE STUDENT

He either disconnects or acts to settle his or her situation. No halfway measures.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 29 April 1965 Issue III
ETHICS REVIEW

Staff member found to be Potential Trouble Sources are handled like any other Potential Trouble Source...They are of course denied auditing or training until they handle or disconnect...

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 2 June 1965
HCO DIV I ETHICS SECTION WRITING OF AN ETHICS ORDER

Often no Ethics Order is issued on a PTS. They disconnect at once when the Suppressive is named...

If you name the wrong one or err in that it's a group not a person the PTS won't disconnect. If you name the real person or group the PTS gets a meter blow down, sighs with relief and disconnects.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 7 June 1965
ENTHETA LETTERS AND THE DEAD FILE, HANDLING OF

Ethics looks up the folder and takes whatever action is indicated, giving the person a chance to disconnect if a PTS...

A Potential Trouble Source order is not given the Entheta DEAD FILE routing unless the person refuses to disconnect or handle...

Sometimes a PTS refusing to disconnect is declared suppressive and in such a case it is handled as an SP above.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 17 June 1965
STAFF AUDITOR ADVICES

However, on the Invalidation button one commonly finds suppressive persons around the pc and the auditor must send the pc to Ethics at session end to get the matter disconnected or handled.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 16 August 1965 Issue II
COLLECTION FROM SPs AND PTSs

Any PTS who fails to either handle or disconnect from the SP who is making him or her a PTS is, by failing to do so, guilty of a Suppressive Act.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 26 August 1965
ETHICS E-METER CHECK

As soon as the Emergency is over, all staff (except SPs found or undisconnected PTSs) are returned to original post held, entering the org again through Ethics...

All persons handled this way (except PTSs who have disconnected and SPs who are no longer on staff anyway) are warned that they should take action swiftly (if they have not already done so) to improve their case shape.

- - -

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 14 October 1965
POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE ROUTING

Ethics must require the person to handle or disconnect. If the person will not handle or disconnect, the person is sent again to Review as the right SP has NOT been found.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 30 December 1965
PTS AUDITING AND ROUTING

In cases where a handle or disconnect does not resolve the PTS situation, or in auditing a preclear to maintain stability of Release Levels, the action follows Search and Discovery technology.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 27 September 1966
THE ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST

If you were to weed out of your past by proper search and discovery those anti-social persons you have known and if you then disconnected, you might experience great relief.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 26 December 1966
ADMIN KNOW-HOW PTS SECTIONS, PERSONNEL AND EXECS

As one cannot easily disconnect from suppressive society points without leaving the society, it remains that an executive must handle, if not the SP social groups, at least the situation developing from them and into the org. Ideally one removes the SPs in the social groups.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 29 June 1968
ENROLLMENT IN SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS

It does not matter whether the person so connected disconnects or handles, or whether the connection has been previously severed.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 7 December 1969
THE ETHICS OFFICER

The job of the E/O is to disconnect and de-power the criminal and so protect the group.

- - -

HCO POLICY LETTER of 23 December 1965
ETHICS SUPPRESSIVE ACTS SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS THE FAIR GAME LAW

Suppressive Acts are defined as actions or omissions undertaken to knowingly suppress, reduce or impede Scientology or Scientologists. Such Suppressive Acts include...failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of Suppressive Acts...

Any PTS who fails to either handle or disconnect from the SP who is making him or her a PTS is, by failing to do so, guilty of a Suppressive Act...

If they would act with determination one way or the other - reform the Suppressive Person or disconnect, they could then make gains and recover their potential...

The suppressed Scientologist did not act in good time to avert the trouble by handling the antagonistic family member as a suppressive source or disconnect fully...

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 6 August AD 15
QUALIFICATIONS TECHNICAL ACTIONS

When (and if) the pc gets a clean "bill of health" from Ethics (has disconnected or whatever) Review can get the pc back again and finish up the incomplete actions outlined in this section.

- - -

HCO Policy Letter of 14 March 1968
POLICIES GOVERNING THE QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION

To Ethics after the S & Ds to disconnect naturally (unless ended on a FN and he's not been declared PTS)...

If item found send to Ethics for disconnection.

- - -

HCO Policy Letter of 5 August 1965
RELEASE CHECK OUTS

If the pc has been declared and the pc Roller Coasters and the TA goes up, send to Ethics as PTS - and be cross if Ethics gets "reasonable" about the pc and says "pc won't disconnect" or "not PTS".

- - -

HCO Policy Letter of 20 April 1968
FRANCHISE

Disconnection Letters must be sent to the Ethics Officer of the nearest Org for inspection before being mailed, the disconnection letter being stamped and enveloped properly for such the Ethics Officer needs only to inspect it and post it.

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 8 November 1965
SUPPESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS

Find the Suppressive, make the pc handle or disconnect.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 24 November 1965
SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

The person is asked if anyone is invalidating him or his gains or Scientology and the pc answers with a name and is then told to handle or disconnect from that person, the good indicators come in promptly and the person is quite satisfied...

The pc does not begin to worry about the consequences of disconnection...

The pc who isn't sure, won't disconnect, or still Roller Coasters, or who doesn't brighten up, can't name any SP at all, is a Type Two...

Just as you tell a Type Two to disconnect from the actual SP (wherever found on the track) you must disconnect the person from the environment.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 21 January 1966
SEARCH AND DISCOVERY (ETHICS TYPE CASES, PTSs) S & D ERRORS

When you have a failed Search and Discovery, the following are incorrect or have been omitted:
... Person has not actually been made to disconnect from the SP by declaration in writing.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 20 July 1966
THE TYPE TWO PTS

It has been revealed at Saint Hill that HGC auditors and Review auditors are permitting their preclears to be sent through to Ethics for writing disconnection letters to any person or group which the preclear thinks to have been suppressive of him and then continuing the Search and Discovery to find the SP on the list.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 24 April 1972 Issue I
PTS INTERVIEWS

The Interview is followed by the Ethics action of HCO PL 5 April 72 or other Ethics such as handling or disconnecting and posting as called for in policy.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 10 August 1973
PTS HANDLING

That getting rid of the condition requires three basic actions: A. Discover. B. Handle or disconnect...

If that suppression is located and the person handles or disconnects, the condition diminishes...

A PTS person can be markedly helped in three ways: (a) gaining an understanding of the tech of the condition (b) discovering to what or to whom he is PTS (c) handling or disconnecting...

So you ask him if he wants to handle or disconnect. Now as sparks will really fly if he dramatically disconnects and he can't see how he can, you persuade him to begin to handle on a gradient scale...

You can get complexities such as a person being PTS to an unknown person in his vicinity that he may have to find before he can handle or disconnect.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 31 December 1978 Issue II
OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

Once spotted, the potential trouble source can be assisted in working out a handling for that terminal, or more rarely, in deciding to disconnect from that person.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 16 April 1982
MORE ON PTS HANDLING

The reasons he cannot handle are because he tries to do it in the heroic fashion that is required in a disconnect.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 18 September 1972
EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE C

He has not formally disconnected by the book.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 19 October 1972
EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE D

Auditors new program and comments -
1. Disconnect or handle present PTS Type A situation through MAA...

She had disconnected in every way except through this House = Money Line.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 29 October 1972
EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE K

The pc disconnects from three of the SPs found in the session except the Org terminal which is left.

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 30 October 1972
EXPANDED DIANETIC CASE L

LRH PROGRAM 18.5.72 -
Bad OCA. Low TA. Blames seniors. Lots HAV and Tch Assist..
13. Dof P disconnect.

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

- - -

The Scientology reference below might be a bit long, but still falls within the legal FAIR USE guidelines.

FAIR USE guidelines here:

Copyright and Fair Use - Information & Library Services - UMUC

Most of the sentences copied here use the word Disconnect. Occasionally, a sentence immediately before or after the sentence that says Disconnect is included here, strictly for context.

If Scientology did not use the word Disconnect so much, this FAIR USE reference would be much shorter.

Don’t blame me that Scientology uses the word Disconnect so many times in this reference.

Scientology Sacred Scriptures:

- - -

HCO Bulletin of 10 September 1983
PTSness AND DISCONNECTION

In the HCOBs on PTS tech you'll see the phrase "handle or disconnect"...

The term "handle" most commonly means, when used in relation to PTS tech, to smooth out a situation with another person by applying the tech of communication.

The term "disconnection" is defined as a self-determined decision made by an individual that he is not going to be connected to another. It is a severing of a communication line.

The basic principle of handle or disconnect exists in any group and ours is no different...

It is much like trying to deal with a criminal. If he will not handle, the society resorts to the only other solution: It "disconnects" the criminal from the society...

But if Pete cannot handle the situation, he is left with no other choice but to disconnect (sever the marriage communication lines if only by separation)...

In order to resolve the PTS condition, he either HANDLES the other person's antagonism (as covered in the materials on PTS handling) or, as a last resort when all attempts to handle have failed, he disconnects from the person...

With our tech of handle or disconnect, we are, in actual fact, doing nothing different than any society or group or marriage down through thousands of years.

Earlier, disconnection as a condition was cancelled. It had been abused by a few individuals who'd failed to handle situations which could have been handled and who lazily or criminally disconnected, thereby creating situations even worse than the original because it was the wrong action...

Thus, they screamed to high heaven if anyone dared to apply the tech of "handle or disconnect"...

It's bad enough that there are governments trying, through the use of force, to prevent people from disconnecting from them (witness those who want to leave Russia but can't!).

The bare fact is that disconnection is a vital tool in handling PTSness and can be very effective when used correctly.

Therefore, the tech of disconnection is hereby restored to use, in the hands of those persons thoroughly and standardly trained in PTS/SP tech...

It is most commonly a lack of correct information about Scientology that causes the problem or upset. In such a case, simply having the PTS disconnect would not help matters and would actually be a nonconfront of the situation...

When an Ethics Officer finds that a Scientologist is PTS to a family member, he does not recommend that the person disconnect from the antagonistic source. The E/O's advice to the Scientologist is to handle...

How a disconnection is done depends on the circumstances...

He need not write any sort of "disconnection" letter to the psychiatric clinic. He simply changes his environment - which is, in effect, a disconnection from the suppressive environment...

Example: a pc is connected to a person or group that has been declared suppressive by HCO in a published ethics order. He should disconnect and, if he wants to inform the SP of the fact, he may write a letter of disconnection... It would state the fact of the disconnection and the reason for it... The PC simply disconnects...

To fail or refuse to disconnect from a suppressive person not only denies the PTS case gain, it is also supportive of the suppressive - in itself a Suppressive Act...

But it still requires that during the handling the person disconnects...

The technology of disconnection is essential in the handling of PTSes.

- - -

- - -

- - -

Alrighty then, that should be enough Scientology Disconnection references for now. There are more references, not quoted here. More references to Disconnection are in assorted Scientology basic books.

The references used above are FAIR USE quotes from Hubbard Communication Office Policy Letters (HCOPLs) and Hubbard Communication Office Bulletins (HCOBs).

Try looking in Wikileaks for full references, if you want to read entire policies rather than short FAIR USE excerpts.

Oh, and Pat Harney, have fun trying to spin this.

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

Bitches don't know bout my disconnectionz!


copypasta, copypasta, copypasta, copypasta, copypasta, copypasta this shi- to every story that denies disconnection

+1 SP and +1 LULZ to enronny

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

When she says that there's no policy of disconnecting from people who have left Scientology, there's another "acceptable truth". The disconnection policy applies to SP's, and of course, anyone who leaves without "routing out" (read, brainwashing, coercion, and guilt-tripping cranked up to full throttle) is automatically suppressive.

Re: Scientology Disconnection Policy (Fair Use references)

She also squirrels the tech by telling people that L. Ron's policy doesn't exist when the Scientology website says it DOES.

proxy-condom, then here, or just quote/copy/paste for further distribution:

PTS Handling - Cause of Suppression, How can Scientology help me...

Leah Remini is using this thread as a reference.

https://twitter.com/LeahRemini/status/782945979578327040

* * * * * BEGIN QUOTATION * * * * *

Leah ReminiVerified account‏@LeahRemini

@str8upandvert @gemthetwit @grumpyfootyfan @fruitxxbat M-9 these https://whyweprotest.net/threads/scientology-disconnection-policy-fair-use-references.7770/…


* * * * * END QUOTATION * * * * *

EDITED TO ADD:

I love it when Leah uses Scientology lingo ("M-9 these") in response to Scientologists. It is her way of telling them she knows her shit about Scientology.

.

Here's a full list of the Scientology 'scripture' which requires and/or references disconnection in relation to the PTS/SP Doctrine.

"Certainty" Vol. 7, No. 2 (1960) - WHY SOME FIGHT SCIENTOLOGY

HCO PL 27 Oct. 1964 (Re-issued on 23 June 1967) (Replaces HCO Pol Ltr 5 Nov 1964) TROUBLESOME SOURCES

HCO PL 7 March 1965RB I, SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS

HCO PL 5 Apr. 1965 - HANDLING THE SUPPRESSIVE PERSON, THE BASIS OF INSANITY

Tape: 6505C18 “Organization and Ethics”

Tape: 6506C08 “Handling the PTS”

HCO PL 19 July 1965 (Issue II) – SEPARATION ORDER

HCO PL 7 Aug. 1965 - SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS, MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF

HCO PL 16 Aug 1965, Issue II, - COLLECTION FROM SPS AND PTSES

HCOB 29 Sept. 1965 - Issue II - THE CONTINUING OVERT ACT

HCOB 8 Nov. 1965 - SUPPRESSIVES AND HIDDEN STANDARDS

HCOB 24 Nov. 1965 - SEARCH AND DISCOVERY

HCO PL 23 Dec. 65RA (Rev. 10.9.83) (Replaces HCO Policy Letter of 7 March 1965, Issue I) SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS

"Certaintty" Vol. 13, No. 22 (Feb. 1966) "Certainty" - PSYCHOTICS

Tape: 6608C02 “Suppressives and GAEs”

Tape: 6608C25 “The Antisocial Personality”

HCOB 27 Sept. 1966 - THE ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST

HCOB 20 Jan. 1972R (Rev. 8.12.78) - PTS RUNDOWN ADDITION

HCO PL 5 April 1972RD - PTS TYPE A HANDLING

HCOB 17 April 1972, CS Series 76 - CSing A PTS RUNDOWN

HCOB 24 Apr. 1972 I C/S Series 79 PTS INTERVIEWS

HCO PL 3 May 1972R Exec Series 12 (Rev. 18.12.77) ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES

HCO PL 12 May 1972R PTS Personnel and Finance

HCOB 3 June 1972RA (Rev. 8.12.78) PTS RUNDOWN, FINAL STEP

HCOB 10 Aug. 1973 PTS HANDLINGS

HCO PL 15 Sept 1973 HANDLING DISCONNECTIONS

HCOB 27 July 1976PTS - RUNDOWN AND VITAL INFO RUNDOWN POSITION CORRECTED

HCOB 29 Dec. 1978 (Rev.20.12.83) - THE SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN - A MAGICAL NEW RUNDOWN

HCOB 30 Dec. 1978R (Rev. 6.1.79) - SUPPRESSED PERSON RUNDOWN PROBLEMS PROCESSES

HCOB 31 Dec. 1978 II - OUTLINE OF PTS HANDLING

HCOB 31 Dec. 1978 III - EDUCATING THE PTS THE FIRST STEP TOWARD HANDLING: PTS C/S-1

HCO PL 16 May 1980 (Issue II) - ETHICS, PTS TYPE A, POLICY ON HANDLING ANTAGONISTIC SOURCES

HCO PL 16 May 1980 (Issue II) - ETHICS, SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS

HCO PL 20 Oct. 1981R (Rev. 10.9.83) - PTS TYPE A HANDLING

HCOB 16 Apr. 1982 - MORE ON PTS HANDLINGS

HCOB 8 Mar. 1983 - HANDLING PTS SITUATIONS

HCOB 10 Sept. 1983 - PTSness AND DISCONNECTION

HCOB 21 May 1985 (CIS Series 121 FPRD Series 11) - TWO TYPES OF PTSes