Customize

Woo/Science /antivax/other stuph

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by The Internet, Apr 2, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TI: Ah, so you were wrong about something for 13 years.

    Boy Phil--FRAPPIST MONK, Baseballegory Right Fielder, TABLOIDER Designation RADIOBELT (sorry, your are witnessing a retired dekaphrenics's system, which is to their own advantage who is trying to show you how to meet the GED so it doesn't kill you off as easy as it does most mushroom/ostriches these days.

    No, TI. I was conducting an experiment for 13 years that gave me information that I am sharing with you here and others at my Web site, so they have more information to go by in their attempts to traverse of the Baseballegory 7.0 (re above) Outfield Right to Left.

    See, acronyms are just a HOST (Human Organic Shoulder Top) computer's text compression app.

    Maybe it's not that acronyms are all that superfluous or off topic, distractive, but rather that...

    You can't TAKE the acronyms! lol

    BTW, THE TRUTH (Technology's Humanity's and Economy's Totally Real Understanding That Hurts/Helps)--How to get the silt out of a head that causes its brain to degenerate over time) is posted at ww.tabloider.org/thetruth.htm FYI.

    Side note: Acronyms are fine abbreviations because they have a much higher mnemonic component than the mere circumstantial initialization of target terms.
  2. Somebody please remove it's batteries.



    Remove the fucking batteries.
  3. Somebody please remove it's batteries.



    Remove the fucking batteries.
  4. I edited my last couple of large posts if you want to try them again they make more sense now IMO. Phily
  5. Got to get Shrabisky to go pay our rent. SYL Phily
  6. Don't die or anything will you, we'd rilly rilly miss you as much as we'd miss bubonic plague.
  7. The Internet Member

    Baron, maybe if you imagined that you were talking to children or really stupid people this conversation would go better. You wouldn't throw a bunch of acronyms into your sentences if you were talking to a five year old, right?

    The stuff about the shells and boxes and "do you want to know more or not?" --you lost me. But maybe you are saying something like,

    "How do you know but every bird that cuts the airy way, is an immense world of delight, closed by your senses five? "

    Props to William Blake for his efficiency.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Yeah fuck off .
  9. DeathHamster Member

    Citing Bruce Wiseman as a source doesn't help.
    • Like Like x 1
  10. DH: Citing Bruce Wiseman as a source doesn't help.z

    BPS: Help what?

    What do you want to help?
  11. Specky: Don't die or anything will you, we'd rilly rilly miss you as much as we'd miss bubonic plague.

    BPS: Sure, why not, that's a deal. When did you have the plague? What did you do to get over it? Did it kill you and now you have a different body?



  12. New
    Baron Philip Rabisky said:
    Got to get Shrabisky to go pay our rent. SYL Phily
    Abeeceedeeeeee : Yeah fuck off
    Shrabisky: Well that supports my theory. Either I have driving a sane person, namely you, stupid, or you are trying to drive me nuts my being stupid. What is the case from where you are looking at it?.
  13. TI: Baron, maybe if you imagined that you were talking to children or really stupid people this conversation would go better. You wouldn't throw a bunch of acronyms into your sentences if you were talking to a five year old, right?

    The stuff about the shells and boxes and "do you want to know more or not?" --you lost me. But maybe you are saying something like,

    "How do you know but every bird that cuts the airy way, is an immense world of delight, closed by your senses five? "

    Props to William Blake for his efficiency.

    Shrabisky: Maybe, but I think that I was trying to make distinct distinctions between the material shell/plane of perception, the physical (biological) shell/plane of perception, the mental (electromagnetic) shell of perception, the Spiritual shell (L. Ron Hubbard's "Thetial" phenomena) of perception, and the repair of theta shell/plane of perception, which is one shell/Plane above the spirit/theta shell/plane which is what L. Ron Hubbard is talking about when he's explaining processing and people are doing processing on people. The Auditors, they are working at that hyper spiritual/theta shell/plane of activity. They are way up there, top notch stuff!.

    I am figuring that people don't have a good picture of the relationships involved. That stack lines matters up. If your viewpoint is at one layer, it can reach the next regions up or down is what that model about how distinct layers/planes/shells/levels of perception go together with one another.

    That's good to know, because then you can reach people at where they are, their viewpoint is. If their attention is on biological phenomena, it doesn't make sense talking about God because God is so many layers of perception up there, they won't see what you are showing them.

    I was being more architectural than poetic there, TI.

    Thank you for your empathetic reply. Thank you again.

    Sweathogs right?

    I am Welcome back Phily?

    Ha ha.

    Take care,

    Philip
  14. The Internet Member

    Yes but Hubbard and his auditors failed to recognize the 17 dimensions above the theta shell. This is why Scientology is bogus. Hubbard was getting close to this understanding, however, when he described the end-phenomenon of OT-8.

    I don't know how far up the Bridge you are so I won't mention the EP for OT8. I'm told if you get the EP before you complete the level something terrible can happen.
  15. Wow, TI - such an apt and a propos quote from Blake, especially for Baron/Phily.

    I think I lost count of the number of homo novises' preposterous peregrinations I've read online.

    With Baron/Phily, alongside his obsessively idiosyncratic (odd, but creative), even florid language, there is the distinctive air of the homo novis, the übermensch, as well as the seer and the visionary.

    In the end, though, it's all B.O.L.L.O.C.K.S (Better Off Living Life Outside the Cult that Kills, Scientology).
    • Like Like x 1


  16. Amen to that.
  17. The tiger musquitos are coming
  18. AVA: Wow, TI - such an apt and a propos quote from Blake, especially for Baron/Phily.

    I think I lost count of the number of homo novises' preposterous peregrinations I've read online.

    With Baron/Phily, alongside his obsessively idiosyncratic (odd, but creative), even florid language, there is the distinctive air of the homo novis, the übermensch, as well as the seer and the visionary.

    In the end, though, it's all B.O.L.L.O.C.K.S (Better Off Living Life Outside the Cult that Kills, Scientology).

    Baron again here: Thanks for the curvy curve a-crow-(caw caw)-nym (name) (Sorry, TI has my mind working on bad puns, trying to figure out the quality factor involved. lol). Sorry to have to inform you AVA, but biological units pretty much all go kaput sooner or later. What can we do to upgrade the situation while we can? That's where I am focusing my efforts. Why? Because I don't want to wind up in a post opportunitary type situation having to admit that I could have helped, but hadn't more than had.

    Now then, bollix/bollox--to throw or have thrown into a confusion--is the base term for the homonymic acronym "B.O.L.L.O.C.K.S (Better Off Living Life Outside the Cult that Kills, Scientology)?" By this one you are saying that it's better to go through life confused than to take your chances with the death cult's practices? Coming from another communication source, AVA, can you see the possibility of your statement sounds somewhat timid, or unadventurous, to use mild terms?

    I did like your, to me, pretty nice complements, btw.

    I look at it this way. Not to tempt more advanced life forms than whatever it is that I happen to be, but to be of the mind that to get to the other end of it, one much get beyond what is and if you never experience it, then it never existed for you, so you don't know about it and if you don't know about of it, how could you say that you've experienced all of eternity? And if you don't know it, if you never experienced it, how could your eternity exist? How could eternity ever exist for you?

    Good Luck / Bad Luck: If the glass is both half full of water and half full of air, where's luck, Nowhere. If the odds first run against you, in eternity, you are due for better odds, know? ...or no? So why sweat the bad stuff? Get through it.

    Doxey, an old boss told me, "Phil, life is good to those that don't buckle." I go by that and the holding minerals in my mouth at night while I sleep helps me with my durability at the mental and biological planes, so my spiritual activity is free enough to successfully engage in Scientological studies, which to me are exactly that--studies--to learn how to function if I ever shuffle off this game's mortal coil to conclude literarily there to support your, to me, generous accolade of me.
  19. Phily: Maybe, but I think that I was trying to make distinct distinctions between the material shell/plane of perception, the physical (biological) shell/plane of perception, the mental (electromagnetic) shell of perception, the Spiritual shell (L. Ron Hubbard's "Thetial" phenomena) of perception, and the repair of theta shell/plane of perception, which is one shell/Plane above the spirit/theta shell/plane which is what L. Ron Hubbard is talking about when he's explaining processing and people are doing processing on people.
    TI: Yes but Hubbard and his auditors failed to recognize the 17 dimensions above the theta shell. This is why Scientology is bogus. Hubbard was getting close to this understanding, however, when he described the end-phenomenon of OT-8.

    I don't know how far up the Bridge you are so I won't mention the EP for OT8. I'm told if you get the EP before you complete the level something terrible can happen.

    Phily: Your handing me a pile on trial here, TI. I can wrap dimensions around the Baseballegory's base lines if you want to build a progressive dimensional mathematics. Let's define math then first please. Math to me is any way to solve problems using relationships of quantities.

    Dimensions in one frame of reference, to me, can number only four each:

    1. Location (point)
    2. Distance (line)
    3. area (plane)
    4. volume (space)
    Dimensions can all occur in a Medium, which is the total space of the frame of reference concerned, which, itself can contain only those four types of dimensions--location, distance, area, and volume.

    Where a dimension of a smaller frame of reference exceeds the volume of the medium of the frame of reference concerned, or is less than the limit of that frame of reference's sphere of infinite dimensionlessness, that measurement will no longer exist in that particular frame of reference, but will either exist in the next larger or next smaller frame of reference, according to what phenomenon you are accounting for with your mathematics involved and if you don't make them your mathematics, you couldn't solve a smidgen of your problems with them. Could you? (That last idea was a product of Hubbardian study.)

    Now, 17 dimensions, what's that the opposite of--string theory, or is that it? Anyway, Baseballegorian deminsionalization would occur thus:

    Location [Home plate (batting side)],
    Distance (First Base),
    Area (Second Base),
    Volume Third Base,
    Medium [Home Plate (scoring side)].

    Then for consecutive frames of reference, either larger, or smaller, the progress would be repeated, just like an Escharian http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=esher artist dimensions&qpvt=Esher artist dimensions&qpvt=Esher artist dimensions&qpvt=Esher artist dimensions&FORM=IQFRML staircase, but around a baseball field's baselines, so you wind up with nesting (egg type) shells, defined by concentric rectilinear frames of reference,

    Now, are you more or less confused?

    The point that I am working at making here is that the numbers, the mathematics you develop Is only as important as the problem that it solves for you. If your problem requires 17 dimensions to solve, then you had better locate them, but if the particular problem you are dancing with only needs one bite to solve, why use two?

    Most of my problems wind up to require tetralogics--E.G. right/wrong : good/bad--to solve. The geometric format I use for tetralogics is: two nonintersecting lines, whose directions along the parallel planes in which they each separately occur are perpendicular to one another.

    Sorry, that's my first attempt at explaining Tetralogical relationship geometrically in a written linear text format to someone that I've actually gotten away from my own screen. I hope that it didn't hurt your meta shell too much.

    I have to go. It's late.

    Take care,

    Phily












    Didd
  20. The Internet Member

    I made a claim not backed by evidence. Your rejection of my claim as a pile of poo is completely justified.
  21. The Internet Member

    I think you are saying that Scientologists have techniques that allow a person to experience eternal life, or a life that isn't bounded by biological birth and death. We can't be certain that this claim is true until we learn the techniques and experience eternity ourselves. Should we make the effort? Considering the profound personal value of knowing one exists or can exist beyond death, we'd be fools not to!

    Have I got that right?

    By the way, you can put text into a "quote" box by highlighting it and clicking the quotes icon.

  22. [Note to admins: there seems to be a bug in the editing window, which is preventing me from eg cutting and pasting in this reply. I am unable to select a word or sentence, for some reason.]

    Baron/Phily. my intention was neither to compliment you nor denigrate you, though I'm happy that I did not offend you unnecessarily. My intention was to use a little mimicry to convey the message that scientology is a heap of incoherent and inconsistent nonsense. If you remain in any doubt of this after listening to this snippet of L Ron Hubbard's gibberish http://tonyortega.org/2017/07/07/th...-revealed-the-true-name-of-our-earth-society/

    then I doubt whether I am able to understand what plane of existence you are currently operating from.

    Charlatans like Hubbard seem able to convince others that they are perceiving, or are able to live, at some sort of higher level - it's a good idea to massage the egos of people you want to con out of their worldly goods - but that is simply illusion or delusion. While scientologists' marks are filling their heads with lofty thoughts of higher planes, eternities and magical powers, the charlatans running the con are filling their coffers with their - your - money, robbing them - you - of their - your - hard-won sense of reality and anything else they - you- have.

    Whatever powers of discernment led you to believe that a con artist, a fantasist and a crook, as Hubbard was, had anything worth learning? That's a serious question, Phily.
  23. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    It's working for me. ? your browser?
  24. ANTIVAXERS ARE THE BUTCRUMBS OF THE PLANET !
    • Like Like x 1
  25. Anonymous Member

    Hey guys,
    I found an article a while back that pointed to certain inconsistencies in the ignorant person's assumption that at least most of our medical treatments are available to the average citizen of the United States. To be honest, it ended up pissing me off. I thought I'd share it below, as I intend to continue my research into the various topics within. I see great potential to weaken the man by exposing this kind of medical dictatorship, so if you have any thoughts, I'd appreciate them.

    http://educate-yourself.org/fc/
  26. You want to "weaken the man" is that right?

    How about we march on Washington singing We Shall Overcome and ask Bob Dylan to attend and perform a few of his own protest songs?

    Are you going to Yasgur's farm for Woodstock?



    Bitch , please.
  27. DeathHamster Member

    • Like Like x 2
  28. Comment #429 and yours are equally applicable.
  29. Graymail Member

    One of those books on the list is called Healing Is Voltage, in all probability it's suggesting the reader stick his wet fingers into an electrical outlet.


    The people who write this guff are off their meds.

    Thank fuck paper is recyclable.
  30. And thrice woo!
    [IMG]
  31. Disambiguation Global Moderator

  32. Thank you for sharing this wonderful product with me!
  33. DeathHamster Member

    Hal Puthoff got himself another government-funded woo project:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html?_r=0
    I expect the usual woo conspiracy stories that the real discoveries were covered up and the lack of results (other than two fighter jocks horsing around) means that more money should be poured down the rat hole.
    • Like Like x 1
  34. PRAISE JESUS!!!!!
  35. DeathHamster Member

    The latest dangerous scam for the stupid: "Raw Water".
    The guy whose DRM for juice company cratered last year now sells "raw water" packed with all the microbes and amoebas you can stomach

    https://www.northbaynipissing.com/news-story/8050367--raw-water-can-be-dangerous-experts-warn/
    tumblr_n80pzdifl21qg4blro4_500.gif

  36. She graduated from MIT with a degree in Neuroscience. Guessing a little bit more elite than your degree?
  37. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    I haven’t read this spam but it might be Scientology related. Plz take a look and if it is I’ll carefully delete everything otherwise meh
  38. Disambiguation Global Moderator

    I think the anti vax thread can put up with a little spam
  39. Disambiguation Global Moderator

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins